Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:38 am by ImOut
Great post, James.
I had seen the change of the 2D definition in the mid to late 90s and didn't really question it. In the early 2000s I started questioning it. But I didn't finally add it all together until late 2005 and early 2006 I left.
If a person listens to an old version of the 2D lectures by LRH, he clearly defines the 2D.
Isn't it grand to be out!