Anon new website needs Ex-Kids.

Hey, check out the organization page over on the new site please.

Did I get anything wrong in my diagram?

I like it a lot. I can't vouch for the accuracy; though it looks in line with everything I have read.

Nice work. Keep it up.

[James McGuigan]

hehe, aint been here a while, didnt know I stirred the drama pot.

Obviously, you wont be mentioned on a site if you dont want to...especially if I have no idea who you are.

I am changing the front group stuff to just "Organization" cause once we started delving into it I realized that is what is necessary.

You are right in your assertation though DRE, it is biased. It is an Anti-Scientology site. The wording as of yet is place holders more than anything, wording will change to be more fuzzy, but it will deff be biased, as input will be coming primarily from anti-CoS people and used for anti-CoS raids, protests, links etc. While we agree it will be biased, it will be good information backed up by dox. No heresay or rumormill.

Also, on a side not. I didnt call it a cult on the page at all. Just hinted that there will be stuff showing how the accepted signs of a cult are in Scientology. Not planning on actually saying it is outright. Also, it doesnt call it evil or fraudulent. In fact, its probably gonna take the stance like narconon exposed does and explain how its not fraudulent or a scam because the people working for all the groups think they are doing the right thing based on the teachings of Scientology. You arent scamming someone if you think your product actually works.

So yea DRE, I respect your views, won't ask for your help, and thats really about that. I agree its biased, but when a person is talking or debating a point, they speak biasedly to convince the audience to see things their way.

Oh, I also added more to the movie on organization if anyone wants to see or comment if I am wrong about anything. Thx all.